Why I Stopped Publishing an E-Newsletter
By Gina Cuclis

This week I published the last issue of PR Tip of the Month, which I started in July 2005. At the end of the issue, I said I would write a blog post about why I decided to stop publishing "PR Tip of the Month."
The Blog Became More Popular
Several months ago I started reevaluating why I was publishing an e-newsletter. This process started, because I noticed significantly more people were reading Cuclis PR's blog than reading "PR Tip of the Month." I started Cuclis PR's North Bay New Media blog in April 2009 to provide case studies and PR tips related to the changing media landscape in the region where I live and work. Within a few months, I was getting a lot more feedback about the blog than the newsletter, hearing from readers via online comments, Twitter retweets, e-mail responses, and in-person comments. The significance of this trend hit a particular chord with me after I republished "PR Tip of the Month's" April 2010 issue on the blog, and found several times more people read it as a blog post.
Newsletter Would Need to Be Revamped
I then came to the conclusion that the e-newsletter needed a face lift and a refocus if I was going to continue it. I also took into consideration that a large percentage of the subscribers where people located in regions far from my target market territory, or were other PR pros. They were not the audience I hoped to reach when I started an e-newsletter.
As an independent consultant, I must evaluate how I spend my time. For awhile I tried maximizing the reach of "PR Tip of the Month" by simply republishing it on the blog. But there were months when I didn't, if a particular issue didn't fit the blog's theme. So I found myself asking if the time I spent on an e-newsletter was still worth it, since I now have a blog? A lot of consultants do both.
Time to Change or Quit
Then I asked myself, did I feel like putting the time and energy into redesigning and refocusing "PR Tip of the Month?" Did I think it would help increase business prospects more so than the blog? Although the answer to both of these questions was no, the first one was key. I had lost my desire to continue an e-newsletter. Especially when I was having more fun and response with my blog.
Conclusion
I decided "PR Tip of the Month" had lost effectiveness. However, one reason is because I had grown tired of producing it. I was more interested in the North Bay New Media blog. That is where, I concluded, I felt like putting my energy. I share this to illustrate that no marketing or PR activity is going to work for your company if you've lost interest.
I hope my experience has given you something to think about. Please leave a comment and let me know. What is your opinion about e-newsletters versus blogs?
Archived issues of "PR Tip of the Month" are available on Cuclis PR's website.

This week I published the last issue of PR Tip of the Month, which I started in July 2005. At the end of the issue, I said I would write a blog post about why I decided to stop publishing "PR Tip of the Month."
The Blog Became More Popular
Several months ago I started reevaluating why I was publishing an e-newsletter. This process started, because I noticed significantly more people were reading Cuclis PR's blog than reading "PR Tip of the Month." I started Cuclis PR's North Bay New Media blog in April 2009 to provide case studies and PR tips related to the changing media landscape in the region where I live and work. Within a few months, I was getting a lot more feedback about the blog than the newsletter, hearing from readers via online comments, Twitter retweets, e-mail responses, and in-person comments. The significance of this trend hit a particular chord with me after I republished "PR Tip of the Month's" April 2010 issue on the blog, and found several times more people read it as a blog post.
Newsletter Would Need to Be Revamped
I then came to the conclusion that the e-newsletter needed a face lift and a refocus if I was going to continue it. I also took into consideration that a large percentage of the subscribers where people located in regions far from my target market territory, or were other PR pros. They were not the audience I hoped to reach when I started an e-newsletter.
As an independent consultant, I must evaluate how I spend my time. For awhile I tried maximizing the reach of "PR Tip of the Month" by simply republishing it on the blog. But there were months when I didn't, if a particular issue didn't fit the blog's theme. So I found myself asking if the time I spent on an e-newsletter was still worth it, since I now have a blog? A lot of consultants do both.
Time to Change or Quit
Then I asked myself, did I feel like putting the time and energy into redesigning and refocusing "PR Tip of the Month?" Did I think it would help increase business prospects more so than the blog? Although the answer to both of these questions was no, the first one was key. I had lost my desire to continue an e-newsletter. Especially when I was having more fun and response with my blog.
Conclusion
I decided "PR Tip of the Month" had lost effectiveness. However, one reason is because I had grown tired of producing it. I was more interested in the North Bay New Media blog. That is where, I concluded, I felt like putting my energy. I share this to illustrate that no marketing or PR activity is going to work for your company if you've lost interest.
I hope my experience has given you something to think about. Please leave a comment and let me know. What is your opinion about e-newsletters versus blogs?
Archived issues of "PR Tip of the Month" are available on Cuclis PR's website.


I think there isn't a one-size-fits-all answer to the question of newsletter vs. blog - like any other marketing tool, it all depends on your target market. I personally get more responses from my e-newsletter than I do from my blog. I've gotten little or no response from some advertising venues, and a ton of face recognition from another venue (my Chamber's e-newsletter!).
Reply to this
Yes, what works for one business won't necessarily work for another. That's why evaluation should be an ongoing part of the marketing process. Thanks for sharing!
Reply to this